Analysis of Adaptation to Digital Transformation in Government Internal Supervision at Yogyakarta City and Sleman Regency Inspectorates
Keywords:
Digital Transformation, internal control, Apparatus Capabilities, InspectorateAbstract
This study aims to examine the digital transformation adaptations undertaken by the Yogyakarta City Inspectorate and the Sleman Regency Inspectorate, functioning as Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), and to assess how these adaptations influence the inspectorates’ supervisory roles in today’s digital era. The internal supervision process includes auditing, reviewing, evaluating, monitoring, and conducting other oversight activities to ensure that the tasks and functions of regional apparatus organizations are executed in alignment with established indicators. This qualitative descriptive research collects data through interviews, observation, and document analysis at the Yogyakarta City Inspectorate, Sleman Regency Inspectorate, and the Financial and Development Supervisory Agency (BPKP) Representative Office in the Yogyakarta Special Region. The data analysis involves data reduction, data presentation, and verification or conclusion drawing. The study specifically examines digital tools and processes such as electronic audit management systems, digital reporting platforms, and data analytics software used by the inspectorates. Results indicate that, as APIP entities both at Level 3, the Yogyakarta City and Sleman Regency Inspectorates have not yet fully integrated digital adaptations into their supervisory roles. However, both inspectorates have made notable progress, advancing from basic digitization toward digitalization and digital transformation, though the process remains incomplete. The use of these digital tools has begun to impact supervisory functions by enhancing data accuracy and streamlining some oversight activities, yet challenges remain in terms of system interoperability and user proficiency. Strong commitment from regional leadership and the inspectorates is essential to enhance regulatory readiness, budgeting, infrastructure, and human resource capabilities to achieve comprehensive digital adaptation in their supervisory functions
Downloads
References
Abdulridha, J. N., & Gafurov, A. A. (2021). Public control and digital technologies in the context of constitutional and legal responsibility implementation among officials. Revista San Gregorio.
Ageev, A. I., Lepskiy, V. E., & Podoprigora, V. N. (2022). Digital technologies of public audit. Economic Strategies.
Ageeva, O. A., Karp, M. V., & Sidorov, A. (2020). The application of digital technologies in financial reporting and auditing.
Avasarala, V., & Mishra, P. K. (2020). Digital transformation in government: A framework for analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101433
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2015). The trouble with e-government: A critical review of the literature on e-government and public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314546676
Bharadwaj, A., Sawy, O. A. E., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
Boulton, C. (2020). Digital transformation as a radical process.
Chun, S. A., & Shulman, S. (2015). The implementation of digital government: Challenges and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12332
Eom, T., & Yoo, S. (2020). The impact of digital transformation on organizational performance: A case study of government agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101414
Hadiono, P., & Santi, P. (Eds.), Digital Innovation and Transformation in the Public Sector (hlm. 45-68). Publisher.
Flak, L. S. (2017). Government transformation and digitalization: Governance, organization, and management minitrack introduction.
Gonzalez, V. J., & Pino, J. A. (2020). Digital government and public sector performance: The role of ICTs in public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(5), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1832465
Hadiono, P., & Santi, P. (2020). Digital innovation in public administration: Challenges and strategies. Jakarta: Indonesian Public Administration Institute.
Harrison, D., & Doughty, E. (2021). Digital innovation in the public sector: Case studies from leading countries. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1763299
Huang, J. S., & Karduck, A. P. (2017). A methodology for digital government transformation. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 5, 246-254.
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Taming complexity: The role of digital transformation in governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 487-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw062
Kettunen, P., & Kallio, J. (2021). The impact of digital government transformation on public sector service delivery. Information Polity, 26(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-210274
Lember, V., & Kattel, R. (2020). Digital governance in the public sector: Institutional implications and challenges. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13229
Lisina, N. (2022). Digital transformation and public control: Perspectives of influence. Actual Problems of Russian Law.
Mardiasmo. (2018). Otonomi & Manajemen Keuangan Daerah. Yogyakarta: Andi.
McKinsey & Company. (2018). Digital Indonesia: Indonesia’s digital landscape and its impact on society. McKinsey Global Institute.
Mergel, I. (2019). Digital transformation in the public sector: A quick overview. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 1045–1051.
Mergel, I., & McDonald, A. (2021). Digital transformation in public administration: Government as a platform. Public Management Review, 23(4), 518-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1792516
Mikulec, M., & Petrovic, M. (2019). Digital government audit: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1687400
Mohsen, M. A., & Magdi, D. A. (2022). Exploring the impact of the relationship between digital transformation and performance efficiency in the governmental sector. مجلة الجمعیة المصریة لنظم المعلومات وتکنولوجیا الحاسبات.
Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Digital government and transparency: The impact of ICT on public sector integrity. Public Integrity, 15(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922150304
Nwankpa, J. K. (2014). Digital business environment and audit quality.
Oulasvirta, L., & Vihinen, M. (2020). Digitalization and public services: Examining the impact of digital transformation on local governments. Journal of Public Affairs, 20(2), e2084. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2084
Schallmo, D., & Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital transformation now!: Guiding the successful digitalization of your business model. Springer.
Sillitti, M., & Lippi, S. (2020). The influence of digitalization on public sector performance: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 672-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13192
Silverman, M. (2017). Regulation of digital government.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2014). The challenges of modern IT.
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Vuković, B., Tica, T., & Jakšić, D. (2023). Challenges of using digital technologies in audit. Anali Ekonomskog fakulteta u Subotici.
World Bank. (2016). Digital Dividends: World Development Report 2016. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1
Zainasheva, Z. G., Khuramshina, E. R., & Zagitova, I. (2021). Digitalization as a new vector of state control development.
Schallmo, D., & Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital transformation now!: Guiding the successful digitalization of your business model. Springer.
Silverman, M. (2017). Regulation of Digital Government. Routledge
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Digitalizing the public sector: Opportunities and challenges. Public Management Review, 18(4), 556-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1035435
Peraturan :
BPKP (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan). (2014). Pedoman Pelaksanaan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah. Jakarta: BPKP.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 192 Tahun 2014 tentang Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2017 tentang Pembinaan dan Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah.
BPKP (Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan). (2022). Laporan Hasil Evaluasi Tingkat Kapabilitas APIP.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (Kemenpan RB). (2019). Panduan Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP). Jakarta: Kemenpan RB.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Matheus Gratiano Mali, Tri Asih Wismaningtyas, Catur Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
