Assessing Digital Innovations in Public Service Delivery of West Java Province versus South Korea and Mexico

https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v16i1.476

Authors

  • Septiana Dwiputrianti Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung
  • Deska Yuda Amellia Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung
  • Hye Kyoung Lee Myongji University
  • Vivian Kadelbach Universidad Anahuac Mexico

Keywords:

Digital Governance, Public Service, Comparative Analysis

Abstract

This research evaluates the effectiveness and challenges of the Digital Public Service Mall (MPP Digital) in West Java, Indonesia, compared to established digital service models in South Korea and Mexico. The study explores critical challenges faced in public administration and service delivery in a global shift towards digital governance. Employing a qualitative comparative methodology, insights were gathered from various stakeholders, including government officials, service users, and community representatives. The findings indicate notable improvements in service efficiency and user satisfaction, with processing times decreasing from an average of 30 days to around 10 days. Furthermore, 85% of users preferred digital services over traditional methods, reflecting a shift towards more responsive governance models. However, the research also identifies significant challenges, including disparities in digital literacy and access, which impede equitable service delivery. To mitigate these issues, the study advocates targeted training programs to enhance digital skills among marginalised populations, ensuring broader access to digital innovations. The novelty of this study lies in its thorough comparative analysis that highlights Indonesia's specific socio-cultural factors and offers insights to refine existing conceptual models in digital governance. By addressing these dimensions, the research contributes to the ongoing discourse on digital transformation in public administration and provides actionable recommendations for policymakers and public administrators

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Deska Yuda Amellia, Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung

Deska is an applied magister student of Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung. She works at the Investment and
One-Stop Integrated Service (PMPTSP) division, West Java Province Government, for more than 10 years. 

Hye Kyoung Lee, Myongji University

Professor Hye Kyoung Lee is a professor of public administration at Myongji University and a chair of the Committee of Korea-Asia Administration Research of the Korean Association for Public Administration. In addition, she is also a chair of the Editorial Board of The Korean Association for Immigration Policy and Administration, Managing Director of the Korean Association for Public Studies and Managing Director of the Korean Association for Local Government Studies.

Her educational background includes a PhD in Public Administration, a Master of Public Administration- at Sungkyul University, Rep. of Korea, and a Bachelor of Arts in English Literature-Dongguk University, Rep. of Korea.

Vivian Kadelbach, Universidad Anahuac Mexico

Professor Vivian Kadelbach is coming from the Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, 2011-01, to present Profesora Investigadora employment. Daimler Financial Services AG, 2006-01 to 2008-01 Chief of Staff Employment.  Universidad Anáhuac México Norte, 2008-01 to 2010-12 Ph.D. education, Arizona State University Thunderbird School of Global Management, 2003 01 to 2004-01 MBA education, Université de Fribourg Département de gestion, 1991-09 to 1996-02 Lic. Rer. Pol. Education.

References

Aggarwal, P., & Agarwala, T. (2023). Relationship of green human resource management with environmental performance: mediating effect of green organisational culture. Benchmarking, 30(7), 2351–2376. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2021-0474

Akhtari, M., Moreira, D., & Trucco, L. (2022). Political Turnover, Bureaucratic Turnover, and the Quality of Public Services. American Economic Review, 112(2), 442–493. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.20171867

Arumede, M., & Edwin, E. I. (2025). Assessing The Effectiveness of E-Government Initiatives in Improving Public Service Delivery: A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries. Global Journal of Research in Business Management, 12(02), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14859664

Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Democratic Processes and Citizen Participation. Societies, 15(2), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040

Bangero, H. B. (2025). Best practices in e-government communication: Lessons from the local Governments’ use of official Facebook pages. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 102010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102010

Chen, T., Guo, W., Gao, X., & Liang, Z. (2021). AI-based self-service technology in public service delivery: User experience and influencing factors. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101520

Collington, R. (2022). Disrupting the Welfare State? Digitalisation and the Retrenchment of Public Sector Capacity. New Political Economy, 27(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1952559

Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Segura-Tinoco, A., Cantador, I., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2023). Trends and challenges of e-government chatbots: Advances in exploring open government data and citizen participation content. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101877

Edelmann, N., & Mergel, I. (2021). Co-production of digital public services in Austrian public administrations. Administrative Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010022

Esper, S. C., Barin-Cruz, L., & Gond, J. P. (2024). Engaging Stakeholders During Intergovernmental Conflict: How Political Attributions Shape Stakeholder Engagement. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 191, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05448-3

Fernández, L. Á. V., Fernández, Y. J. O., Hidalgo, C. V. S., Aliaga, J. C. C., & Fuster-Guillén, D. (2023). E-Government and Its Development in the Region: Challenges. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i1.939

Hong, S. G., & Lee, D. H. (2023). Development of a citizen participation public service innovation model based on smart governance. Service Business, 17(3), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00536-w

Ishengoma, F., & Shao, D. (2025). A framework for aligning e-government initiatives with the sustainable development goals. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 2(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDT-09-2024-0025

Källström, L., Mauro, S., Sancino, A., & Grossi, G. (2021). The governance games of citizens and stakeholders’ engagement: longitudinal narratives. Local Government Studies, 47(5), 859–885. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1807340

Kim, C., & Kim, K. A. (2021). The institutional change from E-Government toward Smarter City: a comparative analysis between the Royal Borough of Greenwich, UK, and Seongdong-gu, South Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010042

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Digitisation Initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818

Niculcea, S. P. (2012). Management and Education. SSRN Electronic Journal, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1581730

Nugraha, J. T., Achmad, T., Warsono, H., & Yuniningsih, T. (2022). Understanding Information Technology Culture in Digital-Based Public Services. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 11(2), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv11i2art6

OECD. (2024). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024. In OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1) (Vol. 1, Issue Volume 1).

Pislaru, M., Vlad, C. S., Ivascu, L., & Mircea, I. I. (2024). Citizen-Centric Governance: Enhancing Citizen Engagement through Artificial Intelligence Tools. Sustainability, 16(7), 2686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072686

Polizzi, G. (2023). Internet users’ utopian/dystopian imaginaries of society in the digital age: Theorising critical digital literacy and civic engagement. New Media and Society, 25(6), 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211018609

Prasetyo, B., Sumartono, E., & Kusnadi, E. (2024). The Journal of Academic Science: Citizen-Centric Approaches to E-Government for Improving Public Service Delivery. The Journal of Academic Science, 1(7), 858–867.

Rivera Salas, P. E. (2025). Reading promotion on social digital networks through infographics: The strategy of the government of Mexico, 2019-2023. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 03(02), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1221

Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F. F. E., Tejada, Á., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society, 70(April), 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978

Troisi, O., Fenza, G., Grimaldi, M., & Loia, F. (2022). Since January 2020, Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’s public news and information site. Computers in Human Behaviour Journal, 2(1), 1–17.

Wibowo, A. (2025). A Redefining Governance in Indonesia Through Blockchain-Integrated AI: Insights from Estonia’s Digital Nation and South Korea’s Smart Administration. The Fourth International Conference on Government Education Management and Tourism (ICoGEMT-4), 25(20), 1–12.

World Bank, G. (2025). Digital Public Infrastructure and Development: A World Bank Group Approach. In World Bank Group (Vol. 1, Issue March, p. 79).

Published

2025-06-18

How to Cite

Dwiputrianti, S., Amellia, D. Y., Lee, H. K., & Kadelbach, V. (2025). Assessing Digital Innovations in Public Service Delivery of West Java Province versus South Korea and Mexico. Administratio, 16(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.23960/administratio.v16i1.476